Brexit day + 11

methode_sundaytimes_prod_web_bin_9c2de32c-71a2-11e8-ab75-b23b8d3bd1ab

It was 9.00am. He stepped out into the sun. It was a clear, peaceful autumn day. He could hear traffic, but no sirens. He headed towards the tube station and shops.

Around the corner, the remains of a burned out police car were being lifted onto a flatbed truck. The introduction of martial law and the 9.00pm curfew had caused a few hiccups, but things seemed quiet now.

The tube station was open, though the presence of a police officer cradling a semi-automatic carbine was slightly disconcerting. “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” he thought.

He stooped to pick up a copy of the free Metro newspaper. The banner across the top of the page read, “President Cummings’ first TV address from Buckingham Palace – full transcript P.5.

Then lower down, “Johnson ordered to see Trump again,” was the headline. At the foot of the page were pictures of three former politicians. “Traitors seek bail,” accompanied the story.

He paused to read further: “Lawyers acting for the disgraced former Prime Ministers John Major and Tony Blair and ex-Attorney General Dominic Grieve will today appeal for them to be released on bail while awaiting trial for treason, following their failed October coup when the UK was still a member of the EU.”

“Rumours that the government was considering the reintroduction of hanging for treason were not denied by Home Secretary Priti Patel on BBC’s Newsnight last night. “We will consider this proposal carefully,” she said. “The last time a traitor was hanged in this country was in 1946 when William Joyce was found guilty of conspiring with Germany to undermine our great country. Nobody can fail to see the similarities here. Those who seek to place us under the jackboot of Europe can expect no mercy.”

He turned the page. “Our retired Queen settles in to Sandringham – the history of a special royal home.” He turned the page again.

He glanced at the transcript of the president’s speech.

“We will not tolerate looting.”

“Our troops are the finest in the world. They will keep us safe and any illegal foreign nationals will be tracked down and sent home without delay.”

“Our borders are secure. We will soon be producing 90% of our food on these islands.”

On the opposite page was a large photo of military equipment being loaded onto a ferry. “Troops and tanks off to reinforce our Irish border posts.”

The Northern Ireland problem was worrying, but not unexpected. Things seemed to have quietened down after initial skirmishes. Never mind that, he was hungry. He wondered whether there was any food in the supermarket.

He headed down the street and spotted the queue. There must have been about a hundred people there. Another policeman with a semi-automatic weapon was standing beside a notice that read, “Customers will be allowed inside ten at a time, stocks permitting. Please be patient.”

He joined the queue and turned to the football pages. “Spurs thrash Sheffield United as Arsenal slide further behind at Leicester.” That cheered him up.

Forty-five minutes later he was inside. He sadly surveyed the empty shelves. No fruit. No veg. He moved on towards tinned goods where he saw a cluster of people surrounding a loaded pallet containing boxes. “One at a time,” the man said. “You can take three tins each. If you grab more they will be taken back at the checkout and you may be thrown out with nothing.”

There were sighs, and shoppers drifted away as they were allocated their goods. He reached the front and was offered a tin of plum tomatoes and two tins of sardines. “Any rice?” he asked. “Next aisle,” said the man. I think we are still OK for that.”

Only one checkout was open. The automatic tills had bags over them. The cashier was surprisingly cheerful. “I think we’ll be OK,” she said. “Rodney is with the Territorials and he’s off to Belfast tomorrow. Army families will get priority provisions, at least until the rationing system kicks in. That’s the beauty of rationing. Foreigners won’t get ration cards. They’ll soon be off after that!”

He wandered out into the road, passed the armed cop and the queue, that was now twice as long.

He smiled. Yes, it had all been worth it. Now he had sovereignty – and a blue passport. Britain was great again and the president was in his palace. Finally, all was right with the world.

Miscarriages of justice – what can be done to prevent them?

9781909976351_w250

Over three years ago I was contacted by Professor David Anderson, a retired endocrinologist who lives in Umbria.  His Italian home is a short drive from Perugia.  He had an idea for a book.  Was I interested in getting involved?

We had first met in 2012 in Seattle at a gathering of supporters of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, who were framed for the murder of English student Meredith Kercher in Perugia, Italy in 2007.  They were eventually released in 2011 after four years in prison.

Continue reading

Amanda Knox and the HIV test fraud

hiv-test

Within days of her arrest as a suspect in the 2007 murder of British student Meredith Kercher, Amanda Knox was told that she had tested HIV positive.  This was a lie and the circumstances surrounding this fake test form part of her appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

You can read more about the ECHR submission here: http://bit.ly/1XmI1BH

As she records in her book, “Waiting to Be Heard”; the HIV episode occurred in November 2007, during the first month of her incarceration and almost a year before she was charged.  She and her boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito were in custody because a judge had decided that they “might kill again” and because she might be a flight risk.  This was an abuse of the Italian law on preventive detention which is only intended for suspected terrorists and known violent offenders.

The trap is sprung

The fake HIV test result news was announced to Amanda at a nightly infirmary appointment – this was a daily occurrence while her mental state was being assessed.

Continue reading

Rudy Guede, the poor black guy

oprah-winfrey

(Photo shows Oprah Winfrey.)

I was looking for the Google cache of the misnamed ‘True Justice for Meredith Kercher’ hate site today. I don’t like to give those trolls any direct hits if I can help it. For some reason the cache does not show at the moment. All you get is a tab with links to ‘similar’ sites which takes you to other hate sites like their fake wiki. Still unwilling to give them the hits, I clicked on the ‘more results’ link. This took me to another Google selection.

This is how I found the cache of Uber Fuehrer Peter Quennell’s rant about Oprah Winfrey from 2010. He got very cross when Oprah had the temerity to talk to Amanda’s folks about the travesty of the 2009 Massei trial. Quennell plays the race card as hard as he can, especially for Oprah. This is part of what he wrote, with my comments in brackets:

“Oprah Gets Snowed: Why Was She Not Made Aware of The Race Card Being Played?”

(Quennell likes his headlines capped.)

Continue reading

Amanda Knox: A Flawed Murder Investigation

Sums the case up pretty well. Friends of mine are planning to attend the Chicago Loyola Knox Luncheon on December 3rd. I wonder if any of the trolls will show?

Life After Innocence

The Italian Court of Cassation, an appellate court of the highest instance that only verifies the interpretation of the law, issued its 52-page formal written explanation this past Monday for its March ruling exonerating Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito of the murder of Meredith Kercher. The pair initially was convicted in a Perugia court in 2009, acquitted after a first appeals court, and then convicted again in 2014 after a separate Cassation Court panel overturned those acquittals, both serving nearly four years in prison. Knox and Sollecito have since been exonerated, while Rudy Hermann Guede, a man from the Ivory Coast, was convicted and is now serving a 16-year sentence.   Knox faced 28.5 years in Italian prison while Sollecito faced 25 years had their initial conviction been upheld.

The scathing explanation condemned prosecutors for presenting a flawed and hastily constructed case from the onset. The investigation of Knox and Sollecito…

View original post 225 more words

Harry Rag and the garbage truck

injustice

Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were arrested on November 6th 2007. After a year in prison they were indicted for the murder of Meredith Kercher.

On November 7th 2007, the day after the arrest, the Italian Minister of the Interior, Giulia Amati, declared that they were guilty. Their photographs were then placed on a ‘wall of shame’ at Rome Police Station, alongside pictures of convicted Mafia gangsters. This top level condemnation from the government emboldened the media. News coverage continued on the basis that they had already been convicted.

Keep taking the tabloids

Within hours of Meredith’s murder, journalists flocked to Perugia. As soon as Knox and Sollecito were arrested, coverage went into overdrive. In the early weeks of the investigation, The Times of London was posting as many as three stories a day on its website. Everything that the police told reporters was published as truth. Many ‘facts’ turned out to be lies. None of this mattered. A good story doesn’t have to be true.

Continue reading

The presumption of innocence

(C)Daniel Butcher 2007

Image (C)Daniel Butcher 2007

The presumption of innocence is the principle that a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, which has to collect and present evidence that establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant does not have to prove anything. This principle is a cornerstone of justice in most advanced countries.

Except in Italy

Soon after Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were arrested, Judy Bachrach wrote an article for Vanity Fair magazine. She quoted ecclesiastical judge Count Neri Capponi who informed her that things would not go Knox’s way. “Our system stems from the Inquisition and also from medieval law,” he explained. What this means, in effect, is that justice in Italy “is based on the supremacy of the prosecution. This nullifies the fact—written in our constitution by the way—that you’re innocent until proven guilty.”

Continue reading